Construction must begin by June 30, 2026 to qualify. That is 26 days from now.
← Back to Articles
Section 179D  ·  EECBP  ·  Sunsetting June 2026

The deduction designers
don't know they can claim

Section 179D lets architects, engineers, and design-build contractors take a federal tax deduction for energy-efficient work they perform on government and nonprofit buildings. Here is how it works, who qualifies, and why the window is closing.

$5.94Per sq ft, max (2026) 3Building systems 5xPrevailing wage multiplier June 30Sunset deadline
The Premise

What Section 179D actually is

Section 179D of the Internal Revenue Code creates a federal income tax deduction for installing energy-efficient property in commercial buildings. It is a deduction, not a credit, so it reduces taxable income rather than the tax itself.

The provision has been part of the tax code since 2005, but the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 transformed it. The IRA lowered the qualification threshold from 50% energy savings to 25%, expanded the eligible building owners to include nonprofits and tribal governments, introduced a 5x multiplier for projects meeting prevailing wage and apprenticeship standards, and made the deduction permanent with inflation adjustments.

Then the One Big Beautiful Bill Act pulled it back. Signed July 4, 2025, OBBBA sunsets Section 179D for any property whose construction begins after June 30, 2026. Projects already underway or completed remain eligible, but the pipeline for new claims is closing.

Why designers should care Government agencies and nonprofits cannot use a tax deduction because they do not pay income tax. Congress solved this by allowing those owners to allocate the deduction to the person primarily responsible for designing the energy-efficient property. That person is usually the architect, the engineer, or the design-build contractor. The designer claims the deduction on their own return as an ordinary income offset, and the building owner's basis is unaffected.
Eligibility

Who qualifies as a designer

The deduction flows to the person who creates the technical specifications for the energy-efficient property. Not the person who installs, repairs, or maintains it.

Architects

Building envelope design, overall energy strategy, and coordination of energy-efficient systems across the project.

Engineers

MEP design for HVAC, lighting, and service water heating systems. Each system can have its own qualifying designer.

Design-build contractors

Firms that both design and construct, provided they hold the design contract and create the technical specifications.

More than one designer per project

Because 179D covers three distinct building systems, each can have its own designer. The architect might claim the envelope deduction while the MEP engineer claims the HVAC and lighting portions. The allocation is determined by the building owner and documented in the allocation letter. There is no requirement that one person take the entire deduction.

Which building owners can allocate

The IRA expanded the list of "specified tax-exempt entities" beyond government agencies. Any of these owners can pass the deduction to their designer:

Government agenciesFederal, state, local, including school districts, transit authorities, libraries, courthouses, fire stations, military facilities.
Indian tribal governmentsTribal governments and Alaska Native Corporations.
501(c) nonprofitsUniversities, hospitals, museums, religious organizations, charities. Added by the IRA, effective 2023 forward.
Other tax-exempt orgsAny organization exempt from tax under IRC 501(a), including pension funds and certain cooperative organizations.

Key takeaways

  1. The test is whether you created the technical specifications. Installers, repairers, and maintainers do not qualify.
  2. Each of the three building systems (lighting, HVAC/hot water, envelope) can have a separate qualifying designer on the same project.
  3. Post-IRA, the eligible owner list expanded to include 501(c) nonprofits, which dramatically widened the pool of qualifying buildings.
The Numbers

How much the deduction is worth

The deduction scales with energy savings and multiplies by five if the project meets prevailing wage and apprenticeship (PW&A) requirements. For 2026, the inflation-adjusted maximums are:

Base (no PW&A)
$1.19
per sq ft at 50%+ savings
Starts at $0.59 for 25% savings
vs.
Enhanced (with PW&A)
$5.94
per sq ft at 50%+ savings
Starts at $2.97 for 25% savings

The math is a sliding scale. At 25% energy cost savings, the base deduction is $0.59 per square foot, climbing by $0.02 for each additional percentage point of savings up to the cap at roughly 50%. Meet prevailing wage and apprenticeship rules and that entire scale multiplies by five.

Example: 50,000 sq ft public school, 40% energy savings, PW&A met 50,000 sq ft qualifying area × $4.77 / sq ft 40% savings + PW&A = DEDUCTION $238,500 At a 37% marginal rate, that deduction saves the designer $88,245 in federal tax. On a project they were already paid to design.
The deduction accrues to the designer as an ordinary income offset. The school's depreciable basis is unaffected because tax-exempt entities have no basis to reduce.
Prevailing wage matters enormously The 5x multiplier is the difference between a $59,500 deduction and a $297,000 deduction on a 50,000-square-foot building at maximum savings. Prevailing wage means every laborer and mechanic is paid at or above the local rate set by the Department of Labor (the same Davis-Bacon rates used on federal contracts), and at least 15% of total labor hours are performed by registered apprentices. Documentation is certified payroll records, not a handshake.
The Process

How to claim it, step by step

The deduction lives or dies by its documentation file. Sloppy or unsupported filings draw scrutiny on Form 7205, the IRS's primary audit-targeting tool for 179D claims.

Design to beat ASHRAE 90.1 by 25%+

The building's total annual energy and power costs must be at least 25% below the ASHRAE Reference Standard 90.1 baseline for the applicable year. Greater savings unlock a larger per-square-foot deduction on a sliding scale up to roughly 50%.

Commission independent energy modeling

A qualified third party runs an IRS-approved software simulation (eQUEST, EnergyPlus, Trane TRACE, or similar), comparing the building against the ASHRAE reference building. Self-certification voids the deduction.

Obtain the allocation letter

The tax-exempt building owner signs a formal letter allocating the 179D deduction to the designer(s). The letter must identify the building, the designer, the system(s) covered, and the deduction amount. This is the legal instrument that transfers the deduction.

Ensure prevailing wage and apprenticeship compliance

If pursuing the enhanced (5x) deduction, collect and retain certified payroll records and apprenticeship labor-hour logs. These cannot be assembled retroactively.

File Form 7205 with the tax return

The designer attaches Form 7205 to their return, documenting the building, the energy modeling, the allocation, and the deduction claimed. The full certification and allocation file is retained but not submitted unless requested on exam.

Look-back opportunity Designers who performed qualifying work in prior years but never claimed the deduction can still capture it through a look-back study and Form 3115 (change in accounting method). This applies to projects placed in service within the statute of limitations, typically three years, though the method change itself creates a longer window. The look-back is one of the most underused features of the provision.
The Deadline

The sunset, and what to do about it

OBBBA repealed Section 179D for property whose construction begins after June 30, 2026. That is not a "placed in service" deadline. It is a "beginning of construction" deadline, which means the rules for establishing that start matter.

The IRS recognizes two paths for beginning of construction. Either physical work of a significant nature begins on the project (the Physical Work Test), or the taxpayer incurs at least 5% of total project cost (the 5% Safe Harbor). Site clearing and grading alone do not count. For projects in the pipeline, the decision is straightforward: break ground or lock in at least 5% of cost before July 1, 2026.

Projects that begin construction before the deadline remain fully eligible, even if the building is not placed in service until years later. There is a continuity requirement, but the IRS has historically provided safe harbors of four to six years between beginning of construction and placed in service for energy incentives.

What designers should do now Audit the pipeline. Identify every project in design or pre-construction for a government or nonprofit client. For projects that have not broken ground, coordinate with the owner and general contractor to establish beginning of construction before July 1. For completed projects where the deduction was never claimed, commission a look-back study. The statute-of-limitations clock is running on the older ones. For projects deep in design but not near construction, explore the 5% Safe Harbor path by incurring costs against the project before the deadline.

Key takeaways

  1. The sunset is tied to beginning of construction, not placed in service. Projects that start before June 30, 2026 are grandfathered.
  2. The IRS recognizes two paths: Physical Work Test or the 5% Safe Harbor. Site clearing alone is not enough.
  3. Completed prior-year projects can still be captured through a look-back study and Form 3115 method change.
  4. A bill (H.R. 8477, the American Energy Dominance Act) has been introduced to extend or restore the provision, but it has not passed. Plan for the deadline as written.
The Bottom Line

Section 179D in a sentence

If you design energy-efficient buildings for government agencies, schools, hospitals, nonprofits, or tribal entities, there is a federal deduction, up to $5.94 per square foot, that you can claim on your own return for work you already performed. The provision sunsets for new projects starting after June 30, 2026. The look-back provision means prior years may still be in play. The documentation requirements are real, but the payoff scales with the size of the building, and very few eligible designers are claiming it.